Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 9-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12763156 |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Dimir Midrange | silversane | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Dimir Midrange | katalmach | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Dimir Midrange | harlouuk | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Omniscience , Azorius Auras , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Synthesizer , Azorius Tempo , Bant Tempo , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons
Meta Performance Analysis
Phantom Interference ranks #61 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 18%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 58.7%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Phantom Interference is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 26.17 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 70.5%. Phantom Interference has a win rate of 67.0%, making it 4.9% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 63 | 65.9% | 8 |
| Quick Study | Instant | 22 | 63.1% | 6 |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 31 | 61.8% | 15 |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 8 | 61.8% | 2 |
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 18 | 61.1% | 5 |
| Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 30 | 60.5% | 5 |
| Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 86 | 59.8% | 30 |
| Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 33 | 59.2% | 6 |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 212 | 58.9% | 40 |
| Doomsday Excruciator | Creature — Demon | 69 | 57.8% | 17 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Phantom Interference than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 1 | 36 | 67.7% | 67.0% | +0.7% |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 64 | 67.3% | 67.1% | +0.1% |
| Malicious Eclipse | Sorcery | 3 | 47 | 67.2% | 67.3% | -0.0% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 54 | 67.6% | 67.7% | -0.1% |
| Faerie Mastermind | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 2 | 60 | 66.9% | 67.1% | -0.1% |
| Faebloom Trick | Instant | 3 | 15 | 66.3% | 66.7% | -0.4% |
| Ertai Resurrected | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Human Wizard | 4 | 57 | 66.3% | 66.7% | -0.4% |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 63 | 66.7% | 67.2% | -0.5% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 64 | 67.3% | 67.9% | -0.5% |
| Deep-Cavern Bat | Creature — Bat | 2 | 63 | 66.8% | 67.4% | -0.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 851 | 41.3% | 54.1% |
| Azorius Tempo | 109 | 27.4% | 30.6% |
| Dimir Bounce | 95 | 19.4% | 52.2% |
| Dimir Demons | 66 | 64.7% | 57.5% |
| Unclassified | 7 | 3.5% | 24.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.